The UAE accused the Sudanese army of bombing its ambassador’s residence in Khartoum, leading to regional condemnation from Gulf states and Egypt. The Sudanese government denied the allegations, asserting their right to national defense. Various nations, including Saudi Arabia and Jordan, condemned the incident as a violation of international law and diplomatic norms.
On September 30, 2024, a diplomat from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) reiterated allegations against the Sudanese army, claiming it conducted a bombing of the UAE ambassador’s residence in Khartoum. This accusation has led to widespread condemnation from several Gulf states and Egypt. Sheikh Shakhbut bin Nahyan, the UAE’s Minister of State, strongly condemned this act, declaring, “Our country condemns in the strongest terms the blatant attack launched by the Sudanese armed forces.” He underscored the UAE’s stance against ongoing violence targeting civilians amid the turbulent conflict in Sudan. In response to these allegations, officials from Sudan’s foreign ministry and army categorically denied any wrongdoing, asserting their right to defend the nation’s sovereignty and ensure national security. The allegations were met with serious concern from surrounding nations. Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry labeled the alleged attack as a breach of international law, while Jordan referred to it as a “serious violation of international law and an attack on the sanctity of diplomatic premises protected under the Vienna Convention.” Oman and Bahrain also expressed strong disapproval, with Oman highlighting the incident as a breach of diplomatic norms, and Bahrain reaffirming its solidarity with the UAE. Furthermore, the Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation Council, Jasem Mohamed Al-Budaiwi, described the incident as a “blatant attack.” Egypt’s foreign ministry weighed in as well, expressing alarm over the situation and emphasizing that attacks on diplomatic locations are contrary to international law and the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
The diplomatic tensions surrounding the alleged bombing of the UAE ambassador’s residence reflect the broader conflict in Sudan, where various factions have engaged in violent struggles resulting in significant humanitarian crises and regional destabilization. Diplomatic premises are afforded protection under international law, notably the Vienna Convention, making any breach a serious matter not only for the countries involved but also for global diplomatic relations. This incident illustrates the delicate balance of emerging geopolitical alliances and the repercussions that occur when diplomatic norms are called into question amidst regional conflicts.
The ongoing strife in Sudan has led to heightened tensions and accusations amongst neighboring states, particularly involving the treatment of diplomatic missions. The UAE’s claims against the Sudanese army and the subsequent backlash showcase the importance of upholding international laws protecting diplomatic entities. The collective condemnation from Gulf states signifies regional concern over the violations of such protocols, illuminating the complexities of the crisis in Sudan and the international community’s response to breaches of diplomatic integrity.
Original Source: sudantribune.com
