Lt-Gen Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, leader of the RSF, has accused Egypt of attacking his forces, highlighting potential foreign entanglement in the Sudanese conflict that has already resulted in 18,000 deaths and massive displacement. Egypt has denied these claims and emphasizes its commitment to resolving the conflict. The humanitarian situation in Sudan deteriorates, raising concerns about further violence and the effectiveness of international responses.
Lt-Gen Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, commonly known as “Hemedti,” the leader of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has made serious allegations against Egypt, claiming that the nation has conducted airstrikes against RSF positions amid the ongoing conflict in Sudan. The RSF has been engaged in a violent struggle against the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) since April 2023, a conflict that has resulted in approximately 18,000 fatalities and displaced over 11 million individuals. Traditionally, the RSF has faced accusations from the SAF regarding their alleged support from the United Arab Emirates. In a recent address, Hemedti leveled accusations that Egypt has been actively supporting the Sudanese military by training personnel and providing drone technology, which he asserts has allowed for significant advances on the battlefield by the SAF. “We have been silent for a long time and hoped they would awaken, but they are persistent in the battle,” he stated. The Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has categorically rejected Hemedti’s assertions, declaring them unfounded and emphasizing Egypt’s commitment to facilitating a resolution to the conflict, safeguarding civilians, and bolstering humanitarian efforts for those affected. The ministry urged the international community to critically evaluate Hemedti’s allegations. Historically, Egypt has lent support to the Sudanese military; prior to the onset of the conflict, Egyptian forces were stationed in northern Sudan, having been briefly detained by the RSF following the outbreak of hostilities. Despite initial attempts to mediate a ceasefire, Egypt found such efforts unsuccessful. As Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi embarks on an official visit to Eritrea to enhance bilateral relations and address regional dilemmas, including the Sudanese conflict, the situation remains tenuous. This visit is seen as a continuation of diplomatic discussions oriented toward ensuring stability and security in the Horn of Africa. Hemedti’s recent speech has ignited substantial debate regarding his role in the conflict and his frequent accusations aimed at various stakeholders. Sudanese Finance Minister Jibrili Ibrahim remarked on social media that Hemedti’s discourse resembles a lamentation for his failed ventures in the country and attempts to deflect culpability for the actions of his forces. The humanitarian crisis spiraling out of control in Sudan, with 11 million displaced and vital health infrastructure in disarray, raises alarming concerns. The international community, including humanitarian organizations, faces significant obstacles in delivering assistance amid ongoing violence. Previous negotiations held in Geneva under U.S. auspices have yielded little real progress towards a ceasefire despite promises to enhance humanitarian access. As hostilities intensify and mutual accusations escalate, experts question the efficacy of international interventions aimed at resolving this profound crisis. The situation in Sudan teeters on the brink of catastrophic deterioration if further decisive actions are not undertaken to halt the conflict.
The conflict in Sudan, which erupted in April 2023, primarily involves the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). With thousands of casualties and millions displaced, the entanglement of regional actors such as Egypt has further complicated the geopolitical dynamics of the conflict. Hemedti’s accusations against Egypt mark a significant escalation in tensions, as the RSF has historically found itself at odds not only with the SAF but also with external supporters like the United Arab Emirates, creating an intricate web of alliances and enmities. The humanitarian fallout from this conflict has drawn international concern, prompting ongoing discussions about possible resolutions amid a deteriorating situation for millions of civilians in Sudan. Furthermore, Egypt’s historical role as a supporter of the Sudanese military complicates its present stance as a mediator amidst burgeoning accusations.
In summary, the conflict in Sudan has reached a critical juncture as accusations of foreign involvement intensify. Hemedti’s claims against Egypt reflect the increasingly complex nature of this warfare, complicating efforts for peace and humanitarian assistance. The international community must urgently address the evolving dynamics and strive for effective resolutions to avert an exacerbation of the humanitarian tragedy unfolding in Sudan. Given the unfolding events and the entrenched positions of the conflicting parties, continued diplomacy remains paramount.
Original Source: www.theeastafrican.co.ke
