Lebanon’s caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati has publicly criticized Iran’s interference in Lebanese affairs after comments from Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf. This exchange has drawn attention to Iran’s influence in Lebanon, especially in light of the ongoing tensions involving Hezbollah and Israel, and marks a significant diplomatic rebuke from a Lebanese leader.
In an unprecedented development, Lebanon’s caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati publicly criticized Iran for alleged interference in Lebanese domestic affairs. This remark came in response to comments from Iran’s parliamentary speaker, Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf, who indicated that Iran was prepared to engage in negotiations with France regarding the implementation of U.N. Resolution 1701. This resolution facilitated the cessation of hostilities in the 2006 conflict between Hezbollah and Israel and is considered essential for establishing a cease-fire in the current tensions involving Hezbollah. Prime Minister Mikati described Ghalibaf’s words as “a blatant interference in Lebanese affairs,” prompting him to summon the Iranian ambassador to Lebanon for an explanation. This marked a significant diplomatic confrontation, particularly given the strong influence of Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanese politics and society.
Lebanon has traditionally maintained a complex relationship with Iran, primarily due to the influence that the Iranian regime wields over Hezbollah, a major political and military force in Lebanon. U.N. Resolution 1701 is pivotal as it aimed to halt the hostilities that erupted during the 2006 Lebanon War and outlines the framework that aims to establish peace and security in the region. Prime Minister Najib Mikati’s unusual public reprimand of Iran highlights the delicate balance in Lebanese political dynamics and reflects the heightened sensitivity surrounding foreign interventions in Lebanon’s national affairs.
The recent remarks by Prime Minister Najib Mikati signify a rare and noteworthy shift in Lebanese diplomatic discourse concerning Iran. His public condemnation of Iranian involvement underscores growing apprehension in Lebanon regarding external influence, particularly amidst ongoing tensions in the region. This confrontation may herald a new phase in Lebanon’s foreign relations, potentially affecting the balance of power involving Hezbollah and its Iranian backers.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
