Iran has started to evacuate military and diplomatic personnel from Syria, including senior Quds Force commanders, due to a resurgence of rebel offensives against President Assad’s forces. This evacuation is seen as a sign of Iran’s waning ability to support the Syrian government effectively, as they face increased hostilities.
Iran initiated the evacuation of its military command personnel from Syria amid a renewed offensive by rebel forces against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime. This significant withdrawal included high-ranking officials from the Quds Forces, the foreign arm of the Revolutionary Guards Corps, along with other military personnel, diplomatic staff, and their families. The evacuations were executed through both air and land routes, ultimately directing many to Iraq and Lebanon. Reports indicate that the operation is a recognition of Iran’s declining capacity to support Assad as his army falters in combat against insurgents. As emphasized by Iranian analyst Mehdi Rahmati, the lack of willingness from Syrian forces to engage in combat has precipitated these withdrawals.
The current situation in Syria has seen a marked resurgence in rebel activity, posing a considerable challenge to the Assad regime, which has long been propped up by Iranian military support. Iran has played a crucial role in the Syrian conflict, offering military advice and support through the Revolutionary Guards and Quds Forces. However, as the dynamics shift with increasing rebel offensives, Iran’s ability to maintain its presence and influence in Syria is being called into question, making these recent evacuations significant in the context of the ongoing war.
The evacuation of Iranian military officials from Syria signals a critical shift in the balance of power within the region, suggesting that Iran may be retreating amid the challenges posed by escalating rebel offensives. This maneuver could weaken Assad’s position further, highlighting the increasing difficulties faced by his administration as it struggles to maintain control over vital territories amidst an evolving conflict.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
