As the Assad regime faces possible collapse amidst rebel advances, the outcome of Syria’s fate may depend on external powers like Iran and Russia, rather than the Syrian populace. Analysts question whether Assad will exit through diplomatic means or a militia takeover.
Recent intelligence indicates that the regime of President Bashar al-Assad is on the verge of collapse, primarily due to an escalating offensive by rebel forces. Analysts suggest that should Assad not be forcibly removed, the eventual outcome of the Syrian crisis will hinge less on the will of the Syrian populace and more on the strategic interests of regional and global powers, notably Iran and Russia. The pivotal query now focuses on the method through which Assad’s potential exit will transpire—whether via a structured diplomatic transition or through an abrupt takeover by competing militias in Damascus.
The Syrian conflict, which began in 2011, has evolved into a complex war involving multiple factions both domestic and international. While President Assad has maintained power with the assistance of allies like Russia and Iran, increasing pressure from various rebel groups poses a significant threat to his regime. As the conflict endures, external influences play a crucial role in shaping the future political landscape of Syria, raising concerns about sovereignty and national self-determination amidst foreign intervention.
The current situation in Syria underscores the intricate dynamics of power among regional and global forces in the context of the Assad regime’s imminent decline. The eventual resolution to the conflict may largely be dictated by these external interests rather than the desires of the Syrian people, marking a critical juncture in the nation’s history as various factions vie for influence in the post-Assad era.
Original Source: www.haaretz.com
