Comments from Ahmad al-Sharaa on a four-year election timetable for Syria have sparked a debate about the implications for governance and HTS’s role in the transition, with experts emphasizing the need for a lawful and inclusive political framework as millions of Syrians remain displaced.
The recent comments made by Ahmad al-Sharaa, the de facto leader of the group Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), have sparked a notable debate among Syrians and legal experts regarding the proposed timetable for Syria’s upcoming elections. In an interview with al-Arabiya, al-Sharaa stated that elections could be scheduled within four years after the removal of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, with the constitution drafting process potentially taking an additional three years. His assertion reflects the need for a sufficient preparatory phase for a comprehensive political transition in Syria.
These remarks have raised concerns among observers who fear that HTS may use this transitional window to strengthen its dominance in the northwestern province of Idlib, where they have established control following a successful offensive that led to the collapse of the Assad regime. Experts like Anwar al-Bunni from the Syrian Center for Legal Studies express that a timeline extending from three to five years is reasonable given the extensive displacement of Syrians worldwide as a consequence of the ongoing conflict.
Syria has been embroiled in a devastating civil war for over a decade, resulting in significant loss of life and widespread displacement of its population. According to United Nations reports, more than 14 million Syrians have been displaced since 2011, with many seeking refuge in neighboring countries. Ahmad al-Sharaa’s comments about a protracted electoral timetable raise critical questions about how the transitional period will be managed and who will be included in the political process, especially in light of HTS’s controversial background and objectives. Furthermore, the establishment of a lawful and inclusive governance framework is seen as essential to facilitate a functional political environment that accommodates the diverse Syrian population, including various ethnic and political groups. Legal experts and activists emphasize the importance of preparing an independent electoral commission to ensure free and fair elections amidst the current complexities.
In summary, the potential four-year timeline proposed by Ahmad al-Sharaa for holding elections in Syria has intensified discussions about the country’s future governance structure and the role of HTS in this transition. While some experts find the timeline reasonable considering the Syrian diaspora, concerns persist about HTS’s intentions during this period. The successful establishment of an inclusive and legally sound transitional governance structure is crucial to prevent further entrenchment of sectarian divisions and ensure representation for all Syrians.
Original Source: www.voanews.com
