The diplomatic crisis between South Africa and Rwanda has surged after South African leader Cyril Ramaphosa accused the Rwandan-backed M23 rebels of killing South African peacekeepers in the DRC. Rwanda’s President Kagame retaliated by claiming South Africa is involved in offensive operations. The ongoing conflict underscores the historical tensions and military challenges faced by both nations regarding their roles and interests in the mineral-rich eastern DRC.
Tensions between South Africa and Rwanda have escalated after South African President Cyril Ramaphosa blamed the Rwandan-backed M23 rebel group for the deaths of South African peacekeepers in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). As M23 forces advanced, capturing Goma, South Africa warned that further attacks would be regarded as a declaration of war. In response, Rwandan President Paul Kagame accused South Africa of waging an offensive against the Congolese populace and denied claims regarding their military’s involvement in the deaths of the peacekeepers.
Since last week, 13 South African soldiers have died amid the combat as M23 made significant territorial gains. The conflict in eastern DRC, especially around Goma, ties into longstanding regional tensions, particularly with South Africa’s historical military involvement as part of a peacekeeping force under the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Diplomatic relations between South Africa and Rwanda have been strained for years, with a contentious history marked by diplomatic expulsions and accusations.
The dispute intensified following Ramaphosa’s statement on social media about discussions with Kagame on an urgent ceasefire and peace negotiations. Ramaphosa contended that the presence of South African troops in the DRC was not a declaration of war, but Defence Minister Angie Motshekga warned of possible escalation should hostilities continue against their forces. Ramaphosa also emphasized that M23 was responsible for the deaths, implicating Rwandan forces without directly stating it, which angered Kagame and led to a dismissal of such assertions.
Kagame declared that the Rwandan Defence Force is not a militia and criticized South Africa’s role as ineffective in peacekeeping. He stressed that South Africa should not attempt to play the role of mediator, warning that Rwanda would respond to any anticipated confrontation. Both leaders appear to be at an impasse regarding their respective military involvements and justifications for actions in the ongoing conflict in the DRC.
Historically, South Africa’s military engagement in the DRC dates back to its post-apartheid peacekeeping efforts, which included significant economic interests due to the mineral wealth in the eastern region. However, the ongoing conflict has underscored the inadequacies of South Africa’s military resources. Analysts predict that South Africa is compelled to reassess its role in the DRC as it faces limitations in capability to effectively counter the M23 resurgence.
The ongoing conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has roots in decades of instability, with various armed groups vying for control over the mineral-rich eastern regions. South Africa has participated in peacekeeping missions since the 1990s, focusing on restoring stability following the end of apartheid. However, relations with Rwanda have been historically tense, especially concerning alleged Rwandan support for rebel groups like M23. South African military involvement aims to protect its economic interests in resource-rich areas of the DRC, but has faced challenges as rebel groups regain ground.
In summary, the situation between South Africa and Rwanda regarding the DRC war highlights a complex web of diplomatic tensions and military challenges. As South African forces face increased dangers, both nations must navigate their contentious relationship carefully. The outcome may ultimately hinge on constructive dialogue and a reassessment of each nation’s military involvement in the DRC.
Original Source: www.bbc.co.uk
