Sudan’s RSF and allies have agreed to form a rival government in response to ongoing civil conflict, intending to establish a secular, democratic state. The move, which has drawn criticism and warnings of further fragmentation, aims to assist those in rebel-controlled areas while the broader humanitarian crisis in Sudan deepens. Regional tensions are mounting as this development alters the political landscape amidst a devastating war.
Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and its allies have signed a charter to establish a rival government, despite warnings this could exacerbate the ongoing fragmentation of the nation. Najm al-Din Drisa, spokesman for the United Civil Forces, confirmed, “The charter has been signed.” This agreement was inked in Nairobi and aims to create a “government of peace and unity” in regions under rebel control, as the country faces a devastating conflict.
The war has driven over 12 million individuals from their homes, creating what the United Nations deems the largest humanitarian crisis globally. Among the signatories was Abdelaziz al-Hilu, leader of a faction of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North, which governs parts of southern Sudan. The charter envisions a secular, democratic state that prioritizes freedom and equality, while also seeking to unify armed groups into a cohesive national military force.
This charter’s establishment arrives amidst an ongoing war between the RSF and the regular army, which has experienced significant violence, claiming tens of thousands of lives and leading to widespread atrocities. Tensions intensified after the U.S. designated the RSF’s actions in Darfur as genocide. The army currently controls the northern and eastern parts of Sudan, while the RSF maintains dominance in Darfur and other southern regions.
As the agreement unfolds, Sudanese political figures warn that the situation may deteriorate further. The army’s foreign minister, Ali Youssef, stated his government will not recognize this parallel administration. Critics, including a United Nations spokesman, indicated this development could potentially escalate national fragmentation, exacerbating the existing crisis.
Despite calls for unity, the charter’s supporters assert it aims to assist those within RSF-controlled areas long deprived of necessary services. Analyst Kholood Khair remarked that the RSF seeks to negotiate from a position of strength, aiming for formal recognition as a legitimate government entity, rather than merely a militia. However, some experts express skepticism regarding the wider acceptance of this government, suggesting it may primarily galvanize the RSF’s core supporters.
The regional dynamics complicate matters, as the signing in Kenya has elicited diplomatic protests from Sudan’s army-aligned government, recalling its ambassador in disagreement. The Kenyan administration faces scrutiny for purportedly prioritizing its commercial interests with RSF allies, particularly in light of a recent economic accord with the UAE, which has faced allegations of arms provision to the RSF.
Ultimately, the signing of this charter indicates a significant shift in Sudan’s political landscape, as factions contend for control amidst a devastating civil war. The humanitarian implications remain dire, necessitating urgent attention to prevent further suffering among the civilian population.
The recent establishment of a rival government by Sudan’s RSF and its allies represents a precarious development in the ongoing civil conflict, threatening to deepen the country’s fragmentation. As the RSF pursues recognition as a legitimate governing force, skepticism remains regarding the government’s acceptance by the broader population and its implications for peace. Regional and international reactions emphasize the urgency of addressing the humanitarian crises exacerbated by this political maneuvering.
Original Source: www.france24.com
