The National Council of Traditional Rulers in Cameroon has recently lauded President Paul Biya’s governance, despite the country’s dire economic circumstances. Critics argue that this loyalty prioritizes personal gains over the welfare of the people. As Cameroon faces a leadership void in Biya’s potential absence, the need for real change and democratic leadership intensifies.
In Cameroon, the National Council of Traditional Rulers, colloquially known as the Royal Praise Choir, has once again chosen to laud President Paul Biya, rather than addressing pressing issues such as poverty and youth unemployment. Through coordinated praises, they have asserted that only he possesses the “wisdom” necessary to manage the nation’s affairs, despite ongoing economic turmoil and widespread dissent.
Critics question the substance behind this praise, noting the egregious effects of Biya’s governance, which has led to an economic crisis characterized by high unemployment and a decline in living standards. Many are baffled by the traditional rulers’ steadfast support for a leader who has presided over a country where basic utilities like electricity and water are luxuries, and where the youth lack both jobs and political representation.
At 92 years of age, Biya is portrayed as the singular candidate capable of leading Cameroon, raising concerns about the lack of political alternatives. The reality remains that youths constitute more than 60% of the population yet face joblessness and are largely excluded from political discourse. Biya’s government has also faced criticism for its harsh measures in response to the ongoing Anglophone crisis, which has taken thousands of lives, overshadowed by a facade of stability.
Traditional rulers have strayed from their original roles as community protectors and mediators, instead becoming cheerleaders for Biya’s regime in exchange for favors. Essential actions they ought to champion include demanding improved living conditions, condemning electoral fraud, and addressing the pressing youth unemployment crisis. However, their allegiance to the ruling structure appears to outweigh any genuine concern for their constituents.
The fundamental question is what will become of Cameroon following Biya’s tenure. With no apparent succession plan or encouragement of alternative leadership after 43 years of his presidency, concerns arise over his governance style. True leadership is characterized by the cultivation of a democratic system that embraces innovation and serves the populace rather than maintaining a rigid autocracy.
It is imperative that the glorification of Biya comes to an end. Cameroon’s governance should reflect a commitment to democracy rather than monarchic principles. The future of the nation cannot hinge on the continued rule of a nonagenarian. It is time for the Cameroonian populace to stand up and demand genuine leadership, marking the transition away from superficial loyalty towards substantial change in governance.
In summary, the traditional rulers’ recent praise of President Biya underscores a troubling trend where political loyalty is prioritized over national welfare. Biya’s long-standing leadership has led to persistent issues such as economic decline and failure to address youth unemployment. As Cameroon looks toward the future, the need for genuine leadership and a democratic transition has never been more urgent. The call for change from the Cameroonian people is critical to shaping a new governance paradigm.
Original Source: www.cameroon-concord.com
