Professor Ernest Kofi Abotsi discusses Ghana’s lack of objective history, linking it to self-deceit and historical appropriation. Former President Akufo-Addo advocates for a proper recognition of Dr. JB Danquah’s contributions amid ongoing controversies. The importance of justice, as emphasized by Minority Leader Afenyo-Markin, remains central to Ghana’s democracy.
Professor Ernest Kofi Abotsi, the Dean of the University of Professional Studies, Accra (UPSA) Law School, has asserted that Ghana currently lacks an objective historical narrative. He posits that this deficiency contributes to widespread self-deceit and dishonesty among the populace. Abotsi contends that ongoing issues such as pre-independence avarice and the appropriation of history continue to afflict the nation.
In a recent post on his X page, he remarked, “Contesting Nkrumah, JB Danquah, & Rawlings’ legacy to Ghana’s history….! Ghana’s lack of objective history reflects on our self-deceit & dishonesty & our pre-independence greed & historical appropriation which remains our bane today.”
Additionally, former President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo emphasized the necessity of recognizing Dr. JB Danquah’s legacy during the launch of a commemorative statements compendium in Kyebi, Eastern Region. He urged for Danquah’s contributions to the nation’s political history and development to be honored, rather than being overshadowed by controversies.
Akufo-Addo expressed, “Danquah’s persistent pursuit for the rule of law to be entrenched in our body politic remains the ultimate guarantee of liberty and individual freedom — values that are now central features of Ghanaian politics and must never be compromised.” He lamented the ongoing debates surrounding Danquah’s contributions, suggesting they distract from his significant impact on Ghana’s progress.
The event was attended by various dignitaries from across the political spectrum, including the Minority Leadership and several members of the New Patriotic Party (NPP). Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin highlighted the importance of upholding justice, a principle to which Dr. Danquah dedicated himself. He cautioned against the potential dangers posed by state power transgressing beyond justice, referencing recent troubling incidents affecting democracy.
In summary, the discourse surrounding objective history in Ghana highlights significant concerns regarding national identity and integrity. Professor Abotsi’s observation underscores the ongoing challenges related to historical narratives and national unity. Furthermore, both former President Akufo-Addo’s and Minority Leader Afenyo-Markin’s remarks remind us that justice and recognition of historical figures like Dr. Danquah are vital for the nation’s development and democratic resilience.
Original Source: 3news.com
