Lebanon and Israel are advancing with US-sponsored indirect negotiations to resolve border disputes, involving the formation of committees under Resolution 1701. While some Israeli officials suggest these talks may lead to normalization, sources assert this is not the case, focusing instead on outstanding issues, including border disputes and the status of prisoners.
Recent developments indicate that Lebanon and Israel are progressing with US-sponsored indirect talks concerning border disputes. Three committees have been established to negotiate outstanding issues, following the guidelines of Resolution 1701. According to sources, these committees will primarily focus on matters like border disputes and the return of prisoners, rather than leading to normalization of relations between the two nations.
An Israeli official previously indicated that the goal was to achieve normalization through these negotiations, stating that the upcoming discussions would involve high-level political interaction. This official expressed optimism about President Joseph Aoun’s potential role in conveying diplomatic progress to Lebanon. Notably, five Lebanese prisoners were released by Israel recently, marking a significant gesture towards Lebanon amid these talks.
The US envoy, Morgan Ortagus, emphasized the importance of these talks in resolving key issues, including disputed locations along the Blue Line and the fate of prisoners. Thirteen specific disputed points were identified, where Israel was expected to withdraw following the 2006 conflict. The talks aim to address not only these points but also other areas occupied by Israel, further complicating the diplomatic landscape.
The ongoing situation has raised concerns regarding Israeli military actions in southern Lebanon, which are viewed as violations of UN Resolution 1701. While Israel claims these actions are necessary to prevent Hezbollah from rearming, the agreement signed by Lebanon emphasizes the need for the dismantling of militant infrastructure by the Lebanese army, not just unilateral military actions by Israel.
In summary, Lebanon and Israel are cautiously engaging in indirect discussions facilitated by the United States to address longstanding border disputes. While the establishment of committees reflects progress, the notion of normalization has been firmly refuted by sources. The situation remains complex, marked by a history of conflict that continues to influence diplomatic efforts and military actions in the region.
Original Source: thecradle.co
