The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) criticized IGAD for misrepresenting the situation in South Sudan, particularly the R-ARCSS’s role in promoting peace. PCCA asserts that the agreement has failed to address ongoing conflicts, urging for a re-evaluation of peace strategies and the establishment of inclusive political dialogue to prevent further instability.
The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) criticized the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) for misrepresenting the situation in South Sudan. The Coalition expressed its discontent regarding the recent IGAD report and communiqué during the 43rd Extraordinary Summit, which asserts that the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) serves as a foundation for peace. PCCA deems these claims as misleading and detrimental to the peace efforts in South Sudan.
PCCA’s statement highlighted inconsistencies in IGAD’s assessment of the R-ARCSS, citing violations by President Kiir and the lack of effective governance. The report allegedly overlooks the grim reality of ongoing conflicts, refugee crises, and a divided military. PCCA claims the R-ARCSS has failed to deliver peace and has exacerbated issues for the citizens of South Sudan, branding it a dangerous trap rather than a solution.
The Coalition asserted that the recent violence in Nasir reflects broader frustrations with the R-ARCSS, aggravated by the elite’s political grievances. They questioned IGAD’s claims that the agreement had successfully lowered conflict levels, arguing that the R-ARCSS has not facilitated any substantial political or economic improvement.
PCCA further criticized IGAD’s decision to establish a Ministerial Sub-Committee for South Sudan as insufficient, arguing that the committee lacks a clear mandate or strategy to address deep-rooted issues. Instead, they contend that true peace requires comprehensive engagement with the fundamental causes of unrest.
The Coalition urged regional leaders to reassess the situation in South Sudan openly. They asserted that ongoing turmoil is driven by political succession fears related to President Kiir’s potential transition of power to Dr. Benjamin Bol Mel, rather than failures within the R-ARCSS framework. PCCA stresses the necessity for an inclusive political dialogue and the integration of a national army to stabilize the situation.
Ultimately, the PCCA posited that lasting change necessitates a departure from historical political dynamics characterized by exclusivity and manipulation. The organization advocates for a national dialogue that could yield a constitutional agreement and election timelines to avert further disintegration of the nation. They conclude by calling upon IGAD to facilitate such dialogue and the dismantling of private militias, emphasizing that prolonged reliance on failed agreements will likely incite chaos, threatening both domestic stability and regional peace.
In summary, the People’s Coalition for Civil Action expressed grave concerns regarding IGAD’s portrayal of the situation in South Sudan, alleging that the organization underestimates the ongoing crises and mischaracterizes the R-ARCSS as a foundation for peace. PCCA urges a pivot towards inclusive dialogue and political restructuring as essential steps for achieving stability and genuine governance in South Sudan, warning against the repercussions of ignoring the people’s demand for change. If successful, these initiatives could foster a peaceful future, preventing potential chaos in the region.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
