The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) is critical of IGAD’s recent report, claiming it misrepresents the effectiveness of the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS). They argue that this agreement has not succeeded in establishing peace, instead leading to further instability. PCCA asserts that real engagement with South Sudan’s crisis requires addressing underlying political issues, and they emphasize the need for inclusive dialogue aimed at securing a constitutional agreement and future elections.
The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) has expressed profound discontent regarding the recent report from the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) concerning the situation in South Sudan. They criticized the IGAD Executive Secretary’s assertions that the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) serves as the cornerstone of peace, describing such statements as misleading and detrimental to the quest for genuine stability in the region.
PCCA highlighted serious inconsistencies in IGAD’s claims, referencing the persistent failures documented in the Revitalized Joint Monitoring and Evaluation Commission (RJMEC) reports. The organization specifically pointed to violations by President Kiir, including unlawful dismissals of officials from other political parties and ongoing military defections. Moreover, the lack of peace, as reflected in the continued displacement of citizens, further undermines IGAD’s assertions regarding the efficacy of the R-ARCSS.
The Coalition articulated that South Sudanese individuals view the R-ARCSS with skepticism, likening it to a trap instead of a path to peace. Furthermore, they emphasized that recent violence in Nasir symbolizes the mounting unrest linked to widespread dissatisfaction with the R-ARCSS, which has failed to provide substantial resolutions or a foundation for lasting peace.
In response to the extraordinary summit’s decision to form an IGAD Ministerial-level sub-committee on South Sudan, PCCA expressed doubt about the effectiveness of this measure. They criticized the vague mandate of the sub-committee and questioned its ability to address the core issues of instability in South Sudan. The Coalition argues that previous regional bodies have inadequately addressed the crises, raising concerns about IGAD’s commitment to genuine resolutions.
PCCA articulated that their critique of IGAD’s recent summit is intended as a constructive alert for regional leaders to reassess the realities in South Sudan. They underscored the disconnect between the R-ARCSS and the underlying issues of succession politics that exacerbate the current turmoil, particularly in light of recent appointments perceived as power consolidation moves.
The Coalition contends that both the R-ARCSS and the Tumaini Initiative no longer pertain to South Sudan’s contemporary political environment. They advocate for an inclusive national dialogue aimed at establishing a constitutional agreement and elections, positing that failure to pursue these actions could lead to tumultuous upheaval within the country.
Finally, PCCA calls for IGAD to facilitate the dismantling of privatized militias and the establishment of a national army. They advise that if President Kiir is genuinely prepared to transition power to Dr. Benjamin Bol Mel, a clear timeline for this shift should be set to nurture an inclusive political dialogue.
In conclusion, the PCCA criticizes IGAD for promoting a narrative that disconnects from the realities of South Sudan’s political crisis. They call for a reassessment of the peace processes in light of ongoing violence and political instability. By advocating for a more inclusive approach to governance and an end to failed transitions, the PCCA aims to usher in meaningful reforms and peace for South Sudan. Their vision emphasizes the need for addressing urgent political challenges to prevent further chaos and regional instability.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
