Syria’s new temporary constitution, signed by interim president Ahmed al-Shara, centralizes power in his hands and bases the legal framework on Islamic law. It guarantees individual freedoms and promises to safeguard women’s rights during a transitional period leading to elections. Despite these commitments, skepticism remains within the diverse population regarding al-Shara’s ability to deliver an inclusive governance.
Syria has introduced a new temporary constitution that centralizes significant power in the hands of interim president Ahmed al-Shara while maintaining Islamic law as the legal foundation. This declaration, signed on Thursday, follows the dissolution of the previous constitution under the authoritarian regime of Bashar al-Assad, after which al-Shara promised to establish an inclusive government, marking what he describes as “a new history” for Syria post-dictatorship.
The new constitution ensures fundamental rights including freedom of opinion, expression, and the press, indicating a potential shift from the severe surveillance that characterized Assad’s rule. It also commits to uphold women’s rights and the rights of all Syrians throughout a five-year transitional phase, culminating in the establishment of a permanent constitution and democratic elections for both president and parliament.
Despite these promises, skepticism remains among Syria’s diverse ethnic and religious populations regarding al-Shara’s ability to fulfill his commitments, particularly given his affiliation with an Islamist extremist rebel group. Concerns about inclusivity continue to persist as the country navigates its path forward.
The temporary constitution endows the president with substantial executive powers, including the ability to declare a state of emergency. Furthermore, the president is tasked with appointing one-third of the interim parliament, while the remaining two-thirds will be selected through electoral commissions overseen by a committee appointed by him.
In conclusion, Syria’s new temporary constitution signifies a pivotal shift in governance post-Assad, emphasizing individual freedoms while consolidating power in the presidency. The focus on women’s rights and the commitment to future democratic processes represents a promising change. However, lingering doubts regarding inclusivity and the president’s background highlight the complexities facing the nation as it embarks on this significant transition toward a stable government.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
