Former Iranian officers, including Javad and Arash, provided insights into their grievances against the Islamic Republic in a rare interview. They discussed the impact of Israeli military operations on Iran’s strength, expressed doubts about Hamas and Hezbollah’s recovery, and highlighted rampant corruption within the Iranian government. Both support external military intervention as a means to foster change in Iran’s political landscape.
In an unprecedented interview with Israeli media outlet N12, several former Iranian officers expressed their criticisms of the Islamic Republic and doubts regarding the resilience of Hamas and Hezbollah. Javad, a former Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) operative, candidly discussed his prior involvement in suppressing protests and the regime’s horrific reaction to the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.
Javad characterized the assassination as an exceptionally executed intelligence operation, revealing the extensive penetration of Israeli intelligence within the IRGC. He noted the complete shock among the Revolutionary Guards post-assassination, emphasizing that despite their operational weaknesses, Mossad’s effectiveness was evident. This event marked a pivotal moment in the region.
The fallout continued with the elimination of Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, further compounded by the collapse of Bashar Assad’s regime in Syria, which Javad identified as a severe setback for Iran. He affirmed that Iran’s influence was diminishing in Syria, describing the circumstances as catastrophic for the IRGC.
Javad, once a fervent supporter of the Islamic regime, now perceives significant government corruption and is vocal about the disillusionment that prevails among others in the IRGC. He recounted an incident illustrating the internal strife within the ranks and the pervasive sense of betrayal that influenced his views.
Additionally, Arash, a former lieutenant colonel in the Iranian Air Force, supported Javad’s sentiment, revealing the division between the IRGC and the regular Iranian Army. He disclosed how resources are being increasingly diverted from the regular military, fostering discontent among its ranks.
Both Javad and Arash voiced endorsement of Israeli military action against the Iranian leadership, suggesting that many Iranians would welcome such interventions. They articulated a desire for Israeli strikes to empower the Iranian populace to rise against the current regime, highlighting a yearning for political change within Iran’s fractured military establishment.
The testimonies from former members of the Iranian military shed light on growing discontent within the ranks of the Revolutionary Guard and regular army. The discussions suggest a notable shift in perspectives against the regime, as these former officers not only critique its operations but also express support for external interventions to facilitate change. The insights reveal the potential for deeper fractures within Iran’s military authority and an escalating call for reform.
Original Source: www.jpost.com
