Nasir el-Rufai, former Governor of Kaduna State, recently switched political allegiances to the Social Democratic Party while his son made disturbing remarks threatening violence against Fulani herdsmen’s critics. This reflects a troubling legacy of violence and suppression during his tenure, where Kaduna became known for atrocities exceeding those of Boko Haram. Despite recent declines in violence following el-Rufai’s exit, his history of hostility raises red flags for future political collaborations.
Nasir el-Rufai, a prominent political figure and former Governor of Kaduna State, has recently left the All Progressives Congress (APC) for the Social Democratic Party (SDP). His son, Bashir, made a controversial statement warning that violent retaliation would follow further attacks on Fulani herdsmen in Southern Kaduna, highlighting a troubling disregard for resolving community tensions and an inclination towards violence. This sentiment illustrates a history of ominous rhetoric from the el-Rufai family regarding political dissent and violence.
Notably, in January 2019, el-Rufai’s comments on foreign election observers suggested a propensity for violence against perceived interference, which led to widespread condemnation. The el-Rufai family has a significant history of controversial statements. The disappearance of Abubakar Idris, known as “Dadiyata,” and Bashir’s later comments about the consequences of dissent, further underline the atmosphere of intimidation surrounding the family.
As governor, Nasir el-Rufai claimed to prioritize security but ultimately oversaw a deteriorating situation marked by violence against political opponents and citizens alike. His administration was synonymous with brutal suppression of dissent, culminating in acts of violence that left several missing or dead. Prominent figures such as Maiwada Raphael Galadima met tragic fates under his governance, which included disbanding traditional kingdoms and increases in unrest.
Under el-Rufai’s leadership, Kaduna State was deemed the deadliest place for journalists and a perilous region for religious leaders. The rise in mass-casualty incidents in Kaduna surpassed even those attributed to Boko Haram in Borno State, prompting accusations of complicity in violence, especially against communities in Southern Kaduna. Critics attribute the surging violence to direct negligence and exacerbation of ethnic tensions by el-Rufai’s government.
Despite his controversial legacy, recent reports indicate a decrease in violence following el-Rufai’s tenure, suggesting a correlation between leadership changes and the security situation in Kaduna. His rhetoric around the deaths of political adversaries reflects a concerning trend of intolerance toward dissent, positioning him as a divisive figure intent on consolidating power through threats.
El-Rufai now endeavors to reinvent himself politically, promoting an image of pluralism; however, skepticism prevails regarding his intentions and ability to foster genuine reconciliation within a conflict-ridden landscape. Political allies should proceed cautiously in their alliances with him, mindful of the historical context of his political maneuvers.
The article examines the tumultuous political legacy of Nasir el-Rufai, highlighting the escalating violence that characterized his governance in Kaduna State. His actions and rhetoric fostered an environment of fear and division, particularly against dissenting opinions. Despite a recent reduction in violence after his departure, el-Rufai’s historical inclinations towards intimidation and oppression raise fundamental concerns about his pursuit of political power and the potential risks for those who engage with him in the future.
Original Source: gazettengr.com
