The Trump administration is considering a broader travel ban affecting up to 43 countries, with a three-tier classification. The “red” list of 11 countries would face an outright ban, while an “orange” list includes 10 nations with restricted travel. Ongoing reviews by various officials aim to ensure the accuracy and diplomatic sensitivities of the proposed lists.
The Trump administration is contemplating a new travel ban affecting citizens from up to 43 countries, as revealed by officials familiar with internal discussions. This proposal encompasses a three-tiered classification system regarding entry into the United States, with adjustments anticipated before the finalization.
The draft proposal includes a “red” list comprising 11 countries whose citizens would face an outright ban from entry. The countries listed are Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen. The origins of this list can be traced back to deliberations by the State Department several weeks earlier.
Officials from various branches of the government, including embassies and intelligence agencies, are assessing the draft. They are tasked with verifying the accuracy of the perceived deficiencies in these nations and considering if certain countries should be exempted to maintain cooperation on critical issues.
An “orange” list, containing 10 additional countries, would impose travel restrictions without outright bans. This arrangement may permit affluent business visitors to enter while prohibiting individuals on immigrant or tourist visas from entering the U.S.
In conclusion, the proposed travel ban by the Trump administration marks a significant expansion compared to previous restrictions. The evaluation process involves multiple government officials scrutinizing the lists of countries to ensure accuracy and to consider diplomatic relations. As this proposal develops, it remains to be seen how these classifications will affect travelers and U.S. foreign policy. The health and security implications associated with this proposition are subject to ongoing assessment.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
