Iran summoned British and German diplomats to protest a UNHRC draft resolution extending the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on Iran. Director General Forouzandeh Vadiati criticized their governments’ handling of human rights issues, citing historical grievances and alleging hypocrisy in their positions.
The Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the British and German diplomats to express strong discontent regarding a draft resolution presented at the 58th session of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC). Forouzandeh Vadiati, Director General of Human Rights and Women’s Affairs, criticized the approach of their governments, which extends the mandate of the Special Rapporteur and the Fact-Finding Mission on Iran.
During the discussions, Vadiati condemned the UN Human Rights Council’s manipulation of human rights for political pressure on Iran. She highlighted Germany’s historical human rights violations, specifically referencing its provision of chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s.
Vadiati also addressed the British charge d’affaires, recalling the UK’s extensive history of interference in Iranian affairs and criticizing its stance at the UNHRC. She asserted that British actions degrade the credibility of international human rights institutions and diminish global confidence in these entities.
Additionally, Vadiati condemned both Germany and the UK for their support of alleged Israeli war crimes against Palestinians and their compliance with U.S. sanctions on Iran. She ultimately argued that neither nation holds the moral high ground to advocate for human rights in the global arena.
The envoys from the UK and Germany acknowledged Iran’s grievances and assured that they would relay these concerns to their respective governments.
In summary, Iran’s summons of British and German diplomatic representatives underscores its strong opposition to the actions taken at the UN Human Rights Council. The Iranian government emphasized its historical grievances and highlighted perceived double standards in human rights advocacy by these nations. The dialogue reflects ongoing tensions surrounding international human rights discussions and the geopolitical dynamics at play.
Original Source: ifpnews.com
