Nigeria’s political situation is tense following President Bola Tinubu’s state of emergency in Rivers State, prompting concerns of military governance reminiscent of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. Legal experts criticize the decision as unconstitutional, and observers predict potential destabilization and economic risks. The crises reflect a growing national anxiety about the return to military dominance in politics.
The atmosphere in Nigeria is currently charged with tension due to President Bola Tinubu’s recent state of emergency declaration in Rivers State, which suspends its elected officials. Many Nigerians are questioning whether this move signifies a shift towards military governance, similar to that seen in Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso. Various legal experts, including prominent members of the Nigerian Bar Association, have condemned the president’s actions as unconstitutional and undemocratic.
The replacement of Governor Sim Fubara with Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas has drawn significant criticism, particularly given the implications for Nigerian democracy. Observers argue that such a shift should be handled through political dialogue rather than military intervention, raising concerns about Nigeria’s justification for its previous stances against military coups in neighboring countries.
Last year, Nigeria strongly condemned the military takeovers in Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso, demanding a return to democratic rule. Despite these demands, the juntas assert that their actions were necessary to liberate their nations from ineffective leadership that catered to foreign interests, particularly in resource extraction. These military regimes argue that they have improved national control over natural resources.
As the situation in Rivers State develops, concerns arise regarding the long-term effects of the state of emergency. Many believe that the president’s combative tone and unilateral approach have only escalated tensions, rather than creating an atmosphere conducive to effective governance. Some observers warn that neglecting the root causes of unrest could lead to further destabilization.
The current political crisis in Rivers State raises critical questions about Nigeria’s commitment to democracy and the implications of using military measures in governance. As tensions escalate, observers highlight the potential economic risks associated with political instability, particularly in attracting foreign investment essential for Nigeria’s economic recovery. Affirmative actions towards constructive political resolutions are currently deemed necessary to avoid a continued trajectory towards unrest and dissatisfaction among the populace.
Original Source: businessday.ng
