Egypt has accused Israel of using ceasefire negotiations as a facade for forced displacement of Palestinians, asserting that all proposed solutions have failed due to inadequate U.S. support. Despite ongoing hostilities, U.S. officials continue to endorse Israel’s military actions, while urging more targeted operations.
Egyptian sources have indicated that ongoing negotiations for a Gaza ceasefire have failed, asserting that Israel is using these discussions as a facade to implement a forced displacement plan for Palestinian residents. Reportedly, a source stated, “There are attempts to embarrass Cairo through an Israeli plan aimed at advancing the forced displacement agenda.”
The stalled talks, which have been ongoing since the initial phase of a hostage agreement concluded nearly a month ago, faced repeated setbacks, primarily attributed to a lack of U.S. support. Specifically, it was noted that “the U.S. administration has refused to provide any guarantees about applying pressure on the Israeli prime minister,” resulting in the rejection of an Egyptian proposal for a humanitarian pause coinciding with the Eid al-Fitr holiday.
As negotiations reached an impasse, hostilities between Israel and Hamas intensified. U.S. officials justify military actions due to Hamas’ unwillingness to compromise, but they also advise Israel to refine its military approach. A U.S. official emphasized, “The war must be highly targeted, efficient and effective; we don’t have all the time in the world.”
Furthermore, individuals familiar with the negotiations noted that while U.S. support for Israel’s military operations remains, such backing is not indefinitely available. One source remarked, “There’s no point in dragging everyone into a meaningless round,” urging the Israeli government to recognize its limited options.
In summary, the breakdown of ceasefire talks in Gaza can be traced back to a combination of Israeli tactics and insufficient U.S. support for Egypt’s proposals. The ongoing conflict shows no sign of resolution, highlighting the urgent need for diplomatic engagement. Without a meaningful shift in strategy, both diplomatic and military efforts may lead to further escalation and humanitarian crises in the region.
Original Source: www.ynetnews.com
