Ukraine has expressed disappointment at Switzerland’s backing of a China-Brazil peace plan due to its failure to include references to the UN Charter and Ukraine’s territorial integrity. The Ukrainian government insists that all peace initiatives must honor its sovereignty and internationally recognized borders, condemning proposals that do not ensure complete restoration of territorial integrity.
Ukraine has publicly expressed its profound disappointment with Switzerland’s endorsement of a proposed peace initiative put forth by China and Brazil, which seeks to conclude over two and a half years of conflict with Russia. Ukrainian officials emphasized that any efforts aimed at restoring peace must adhere to the principle of ‘nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine’ and must be grounded in the UN Charter. This includes the imperative of respecting Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in accordance with internationally recognized borders. Furthermore, the Ukrainian statement denounced initiatives that fail to ensure complete restoration of territorial integrity, highlighting that such efforts merely foster a false sense of dialogue while Russia persists in its unlawful activities in the region.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which commenced in February 2022, has seen significant geopolitical ramifications and has drawn international scrutiny. Various nations and alliances have stepped forward to propose peace plans; however, there is a consensus among the United States and European allies that any plan must explicitly reference the UN Charter and affirm Ukraine’s territorial rights. The recent proposal by China and Brazil has raised concerns as it lacks these critical components, prompting Ukraine’s strong reaction.
In conclusion, Ukraine’s discontent with Switzerland’s support for the China-Brazil peace plan underscores the nation’s insistence on adherence to international law and recognition of its sovereignty. The situation reflects broader tensions regarding the legitimacy of proposed peace negotiations, particularly those that may inadvertently legitimize Russia’s territorial transgressions.
Original Source: www.scmp.com
