The article stresses the importance of U.S. engagement in post-Assad Syria by emphasizing the need for humanitarian aid, economic support, and the restoration of international financial operations. It argues that current sanctions only exacerbate the suffering of ordinary Syrians and highlights three key actions the U.S. must take to facilitate recovery and prevent renewed instability in the region.
The United States faces a critical juncture in its engagement with Syria, as maintaining the current economic isolation only exacerbates the suffering of ordinary Syrians. The past decade of inaction by the global community is exemplified by the haunting scene of political detainees released from prisons, only to hear pleas of frustration from those who feel it’s too late for effective intervention. Urgent support is crucial now, as any delay risks further instability in the region.
The fall of the Assad regime presents new opportunities for U.S. involvement in Syria, independent of political recognition of the new authorities, such as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham. Given years of corruption and violence under the previous regime, the U.S. can now assist the Syrian populace directly. Ignoring this moment not only punishes those who did not choose their government but denies them much-needed assistance and investment for recovery.
Humanitarian aid to Syria is essential, as last year, funding met only one-third of the requirement, the lowest level in ten years. While urgent aid serves as a temporary fix, it cannot address the foundational issues of an economy devastated by war. With 90% of Syrians living in poverty, continued sanctions hinder recovery and provoke hostility, risking a cycle of renewed violence and instability.
Three priority steps must be taken by the U.S. to facilitate Syria’s economic recovery. First, the Biden administration should provide clearer legal guidelines and relief from sanctions to enable access to humanitarian aid and commercial activity. The current limited scope of the new license restricts meaningful engagement and must be expanded to foster genuine recovery efforts by the transitional government without perpetuating confusion over terrorist designations.
Second, the U.S. must advocate for the restoration of World Bank programs in Syria, which have been suspended for 14 years, preventing the re-establishment of essential services. The U.S. should leverage its influence to enable partnerships with civil society, ensuring that funds reach essential workers and help restore health, education, and infrastructure vital for stabilization.
Lastly, the U.S. should pursue reintegration of Syria’s financial institutions into the global economy. Connecting Syrian banks to the international system is vital for efficient financial transactions necessary for development. This approach requires setting different standards for the transitional authorities, enabling international bodies to provide support that fosters responsible governance and mitigates risks of corruption.
By taking these measures, the U.S. can effectively contribute to rebuilding Syria’s economy and restoring vital institutions. Progress in these areas could facilitate meaningful discussions about political recognition and long-term stability. The world must not overlook the opportunity to address one of the century’s most significant humanitarian crises, as failure to act could lead to catastrophic consequences for Syria and the region.
The ongoing conflict in Syria has exacerbated economic hardship for its citizens, with years of conflict resulting in devastating losses in GDP and infrastructure. With the fall of President Bashar al-Assad’s regime, there exists a moment of potential restructuring and support that U.S. engagement can capitalize on. The challenge remains how to effectively navigate the complexities of the current power dynamics, while addressing urgent humanitarian needs, facilitating economic recovery, and ensuring stability within this fractured state.
In conclusion, the United States has a moral and strategic obligation to engage proactively in Syria, shifting from punitive measures to constructive support for the Syrian people. By providing clear guidelines for humanitarian aid, restoring World Bank programs, and reintegrating financial institutions, America can foster a path to recovery and stability. Swift action now is essential to avert a deepening crisis and lay the groundwork for a sustainable future in Syria.
Original Source: foreignpolicy.com
