Peru secured a UNESCO certification for early documents affirming pisco’s production and trade dating back to the 16th century. This international recognition bolsters Peru’s claim in an ongoing heritage dispute with Chile, which has designated pisco as protected since 1931. Officials anticipate this validation will establish pisco as distinctly Peruvian, influencing cultural perceptions significantly.
On December 20, 2024, UNESCO recognized the authenticity of a collection of historical documents from Peru, showcasing the production and trade of pisco dating back to the late 16th century. These manuscripts, preserved in Peru’s national archives and now included in UNESCO’s Memory of the World Register, offer indispensable insights into the early days of grape cultivation and spirit production in the region during the Spanish colonial era.
This acknowledgment is particularly significant for Peru amid a long-standing dispute with Chile regarding the origin of pisco. Peruvian officials celebrated this recognition as a crucial step in affirming that pisco is distinctly Peruvian. Former agriculture minister Milton von Hesse declared it a historic assertion that pisco’s roots are clearly traced to Peru.
Chile claims the exclusive designation of pisco since 1931, a result of its push for industrial brandy quality regulations. This contentious issue draws from historical tensions, especially stemming from the outcomes of the War of the Pacific. The recent UNESCO declaration is expected to influence public perception and international acknowledgment of pisco’s true origins.
The recognition of the Peruvian pisco manuscripts by UNESCO underscores the cultural heritage of this spirit, which plays a vital role in Peru’s national identity and gastronomy. The historical documentation clarifies the timeline of pisco’s production and trade as intertwined with Spanish colonial activities. This acknowledgment also serves as a tool for Peru to strengthen its claims of authenticity against Chilean assertions, particularly considering their shared history and the implications of past conflicts. The ongoing dispute over pisco’s designation has deep roots, with the first official recognition occurring in Chile in 1931. The implications of this disagreement extend beyond culinary heritage, touching on broader national pride and identity in both countries.
The UNESCO certification of Peru’s historical documents represents a significant advancement in the ongoing dispute over the heritage of pisco. It not only affirms the historical importance of pisco production in Peru but also aims to reshape global perceptions regarding its origins. This event highlights the cultural significance of pisco in both nations, particularly for Peruvian identity, as officials declare this recognition a monumental victory for their nation.
Original Source: www.lemonde.fr
