Iran has abruptly retreated from its bases in Syria, leaving behind evidence of its former military presence, such as moldy food, uniforms, and sensitive documents. This withdrawal comes after a decade as Assad’s ally, with Iranian forces facing increased Israeli airstrikes and internal rifts. The local populace expresses relief and a preference for Russian forces, reflecting a broader discontent with Iranian control that has deteriorated in recent years.
Iran’s military bases in Syria, once abuzz with activity, now stand as eerie remnants of a rapid withdrawal. Materials left behind include rotting food, discarded uniforms, and abandoned weapons, illustrating a sudden and panicked retreat. For over a decade, Iran, as Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s primary ally, played a crucial role in the Syrian conflict, establishing extensive military infrastructure and supporting various militia groups. The facility near Khan Shaykhun, an important strategic area, was once a base for Iranian forces and their allies before its fall.
Upon entering the now-deserted site, evidence of the Iranians’ last days remains, including receipts for supplies like food, hinting at a life abruptly interrupted. The base, named after an IRGC commander killed in an airstrike, is now occupied by fighters from Hayaat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), who assert control over the abandoned hasards. Some Uyghur fighters claim, “Iranians were here. They all fled,” reflecting an abrupt nature of the Iranian retreat.
The base features a network of tunnels, unfinished interiors, and personal items left untouched, with documents betraying sensitive information about Iranian personnel. Most evacuated forces were largely comprised of Afghan fighters under Iranian supervision, who Iraq-bound exoduses denoted the urgency of the situation.
The rapid disintegration of Iranian influence in Syria became evident post the attacks on Israel on 7 October. This catalyzed intensified airstrikes targeting Iranian positions, coupled with Israel’s operations against its allies like Hezbollah, creating chaos in the militant framework supporting Assad. Trust deteriorated between Iran and Assad’s regime, leading to accusations of betrayal and tactical failures.
The remnants of Iranian headquarters in Khan Shaykhun provide stark insights into their military presence. Notable sentiments amongst local Syrians lean towards disdain for Iranian militias who once claimed dominance yet failed to fulfill their promises of stability. Abdullah, a local resident, expresses relief at their departure, emphasizing the difficulties they endured under Iranian occupation, while newer authorities impose stricter regulations on Iranian nationals.
The current leadership in Syria, represented by interim president Ahmed al-Sharaa, underscores a shift away from Iranian allegiances while keeping future relations in view. Iran’s longstanding military ambitions now lie in ruins, contributing to perceptions of failure among the populace. Locals’ sentiments lean toward a more favorable regard for Russian presence, attributing their comparative passivity during the conflict as less intrusive than Iranian engagement.
Amid the deserted base, evidence of past military activities remains evident alongside construction remnants, suggesting a continuous expansion that has now come to an abrupt halt.
Iran’s abandonment of its military bases in Syria marks a significant decline in its influence within the region. Rapid airstrikes and internal disunity have led to a withdrawal that has left behind tangible remnants of a once-powerful presence. Local Syrian sentiments have shifted, favoring Russians over Iranians due to the latter’s intrusive behavior during their occupation. As the situation evolves under new leadership, the future of Iranian involvement in Syria remains bleak, with perceptions leaning towards a rejection of their presence.
Original Source: www.bbc.co.uk
