The Tumaini Peace Talks, resumed in Nairobi on December 4, 2024, were notably attended by various dignitaries, showing global support for peace in South Sudan. Gen. Kuol Manyang acknowledged the roles of historical leaders in the liberation struggle, promoting unity. While some differences exist between the RTGoNU and Opposition Groups regarding the negotiation of protocols, there remains hope for a peaceful resolution supported by stakeholders.
On December 4, 2024, I attended the resumption of the Tumaini Peace Talks in Nairobi, which was well-attended by regional and international dignitaries, indicating continued global support for peace in South Sudan. I was particularly impressed by Gen. Kuol Manyang’s acknowledgment of significant historical leaders’ contributions to the liberation struggle, which is essential for unity and peace in our nation. This recognition is noteworthy given previous criticisms of these leaders by him.
A notable shift has occurred in the position of the Revitalized Transitional Government of National Unity (RTGoNU), who now view the Tumaini Talks as complementing the 2018 Peace Agreement (R-ARCSS), rather than superseding it. Initially, Opposition Groups believed the Tumaini outcomes might overshadow the R-ARCSS. However, both parties have subtly agreed to link their processes, aspiring for lasting peace.
The call for inclusive participation in the peace talks is commendable, particularly the inclusion of Gen. Thomas Cirillo and Gen. Simon Gatwech, despite potential challenges. Mediators should consider exploring parallel engagements with these leaders to foster their involvement. This could enhance the peace process and ensure broader representation.
There remains some ambiguity regarding the timeline mentioned in the joint communique during President William Ruto’s visit to Juba. However, Gen. Lazarus Sumbeiywo has clarified that the heads of state aim for the Tumaini Talks to conclude within two weeks, emphasizing the urgency of achieving a peace agreement for the South Sudanese people as a Christmas gift.
Divergent perspectives persist regarding the status of the initialed protocols. While the RTGoNU seeks adjustments to avoid duplication and enhance implementation, Opposition Groups resist renegotiation, fearing it could undermine previous agreements. It is crucial for the Opposition Groups to consider the RTGoNU’s proposed changes for the sake of peace. Such negotiations could lead to substantial resolutions to outstanding protocols.
The discussions during the Tumaini Talks have provided clarity on expectations and differences. With the collective appeal from various stakeholders urging parties not to let down the South Sudanese people, the remaining issues appear manageable and could be resolved promptly. Professor Pauline Riak’s remarks effectively highlighted the pressing need for a peace agreement as non-negotiable for the suffering populace.
Ultimately, I departed the event with renewed hope that the Tumaini Initiative may pave the way for peace in South Sudan. As articulated by the Kenyan Principal Secretary, “Tumaini (Hope) is not a casual concept but a revolutionary concept that challenges the undesired status quo for a better one.” This hope is transformative and holds the potential to improve conditions in South Sudan, despite possible extensions of the negotiations that may arise from discussions on the initialed protocols.
The Tumaini Peace Talks present a crucial opportunity for South Sudan to restore hope for peace through inclusive dialogue and acknowledgment of historical leaders. While challenges remain regarding protocol negotiations and timelines, the commitment of both parties to align the Tumaini outcomes with previous agreements indicates progress. The appeal for peace from various stakeholders is vital, and the overarching sentiment is one of cautious optimism for a better future for the people of South Sudan.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
